escort bayan mersin escort tokat escort osmaniye escort
Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Subs fine
11-17-2012, 07:07 PM
Post: #11
RE: Subs fine
(11-17-2012 05:57 PM)jeffbuchanan Wrote:  Back with a new company. Bankrupted last one.This one is geared toward the owner-operator.Big Grin

The really sad thing is that you're proud of it... Dodgy
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 04:23 AM
Post: #12
RE: Subs fine
I agree with dusty!! And I think you and your merry men should be banned from running a company!!!

Proud supporter of West Ham United Football Club
Proud CEO Matlee Express,

[Image: driverstats.php?id=2994]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 06:35 AM
Post: #13
RE: Subs fine
(11-17-2012 05:57 PM)jeffbuchanan Wrote:  Back with a new company. Bankrupted last one.This one is geared toward the owner-operator.Big Grin

I see you haven't been able to come up with an original name for this one either.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 07:36 AM
Post: #14
RE: Subs fine
(11-18-2012 06:35 AM)Norman Wrote:  
(11-17-2012 05:57 PM)jeffbuchanan Wrote:  Back with a new company. Bankrupted last one.This one is geared toward the owner-operator.Big Grin

I see you haven't been able to come up with an original name for this one either.
I was looking over the lists of names in Trukz and chose this one because it means my drivers will have go fast trucks.
Posted by happy hammer - Today 03:23 AM
I agree with dusty!! And I think you and your merry men should be banned from running a company!!!
You won't think so when my company finishes some contracts for you.Big Grin
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 10:38 AM
Post: #15
RE: Subs fine
(11-18-2012 07:36 AM)jeffbuchanan Wrote:  You won't think so when my company finishes some contracts for you.Big Grin

Hahaha.. now that is funny!
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 10:48 AM (This post was last modified: 11-18-2012 10:48 AM by The Mighty Z.)
Post: #16
RE: Subs fine
Not alone funny, impossible too Undecided

[Image: driverstats.php?id=294]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 11:11 AM
Post: #17
RE: Subs fine
Don't want you taking any of my subs jeff!! I'd rather fail and take the fine, then have you and your merry men dropping us in it by failing to complete the contract anyway.

Proud supporter of West Ham United Football Club
Proud CEO Matlee Express,

[Image: driverstats.php?id=2994]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 12:33 PM (This post was last modified: 11-18-2012 12:34 PM by Little Bear.)
Post: #18
RE: Subs fine
(11-18-2012 07:36 AM)jeffbuchanan Wrote:  You won't think so when my company finishes some contracts for you.Big Grin

Our company won't have to worry whether your brag becomes fact is just another figment of your imagination. Our company now bids the contracts to avoid having to rely on sub-contracting out and further eliminate the risk of the bubbasmith clan taking and failing to complete any of our contracts.

To add to what Happy Hammer said, we'd rather fail a contract trying to complete it, rather than risk having any dependence on a group that stays with any given company on a generous average, about two weeks.

[Image: driverstats.php?id=672]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 01:58 PM
Post: #19
RE: Subs fine
(11-18-2012 12:33 PM)Little Bear Wrote:  Our company won't have to worry whether your brag becomes fact is just another figment of your imagination. Our company now bids the contracts to avoid having to rely on sub-contracting out and further eliminate the risk of the bubbasmith clan taking and failing to complete any of our contracts.

Is this because you generally don't like having to rely on subcontractors or because (some) subcontractors are unreliable? What alterations (if any) to the subcontract system would give you the confidence to create subcontracts again?
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
11-18-2012, 02:23 PM (This post was last modified: 11-18-2012 02:24 PM by Little Bear.)
Post: #20
RE: Subs fine
(11-18-2012 01:58 PM)Norman Wrote:  Is this because you generally don't like having to rely on subcontractors or because (some) subcontractors are unreliable? What alterations (if any) to the subcontract system would give you the confidence to create subcontracts again?

Not all sub-contractors are unreliable. I guess it does come across that way, looking at the original post.

If there were any changes to be made, I would suggest the company creating the sub contract have the ability to exclude a company or companies from be able to take their sub contracts. (Other than the number of players required.)

Not having any concept of how programming works, this feature might be set up at the time the sub contract is created, in the manner that the "ignore" feature works. Nobody would need to know who is "blocked" looking at the list. The way the "blocked" company would know, is being denied the contract in an attempt to take it.

This may help "level" the field and curtail some of the above mentioned group's nonsense that has been commented on by many players in a multitude of threads.

It is a shame that a certain group that seems to take immense pride in failing contracts and jumping from company to company to company, get a free pass 'carte blanche' and spoil it for others, in particular the new players they manage to ruin the game for.

[Image: driverstats.php?id=672]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)

Contact Us | Trucking Sim | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication